ADNAN ALI CHOHAN versus PROJECT DIRECTOR, LINES AREA RE-DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, C.D.G.K.
Section 8 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), OI, R1 Non-inclusion of parties requiring suits for possession of immovable property The plaintiff's argument was that the original alties had transferred the plot to him but only in the trial case. The suit was pronounced judgmental. The plaintiff, who was rejected by the appellate court, allegedly purchased the plots from the original allottees and was obliged to provide them with possession of the plots that the plaintiff had sold and the terms and conditions of the sale. No document was filed stating that neither the purchase nor any document was filed which would impose any responsibility on the department. The plots in question were handed over to the original allottees and the defendant / department. Had fulfilled its obligation and the transfer / obligation was not original. The allotments were to confer on the plaintiff, but the plaintiff's department could not demand it from the plaintiff. Failing to produce any document to indicate that the original Altiz gave him a fleet of possession of plots in question, and documentary evidence will be prosecuted after oral evidence, while the plaintiff's statements were merely words while the department Submitted documentary evidence that the original allotments were imposed and whose presence was important and necessary, and the case filed by the plaintiff, which appears to have been attacked for not joining the required parties, was revoked
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
