SOORTY ENTERPRISES (PVT.) LTD. versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD.
Sections 42 and 55 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Sections 151, 94 and A. XXXIX RR1 and 2 of the suit, the declaration against the power supply company and the plaintiff, the injunction requiring the defendant to supply the power in the suit for injunction and dismissal. The petition was sought to be restored, under A. XXXXX Rr 1 & 2, the trial court dismissed the CPC for interim discrimination relief in the form of restoration of the power supply, however, after the trial the appeals court By the way, the trial court's order was amended to reflect what the plaintiff made. In filing a lawsuit for the Interim Assisted Defense Electricity Supply Company, it was released to decide whether the plaintiff was using electricity far beyond its approved burden and had to make such a determination at certain times. Because of this order, the plaintiff's application for interim relief stood as permissible, so the plaintiff company was responsible for the maintenance of the power supply. The appellate court's ruling showed that the plaintiff concluded Has filed a case for interim injunctive relief, and equated the appellate court's equation so that S to ensure that the claimant should not stand in the way of such aid in power. Determine the supply company, independently of the law of fact, and then take appropriate action, if confirmed, using the powers authorized under the Consumer Service Code of Conduct (CSM). ? The Company's appropriate commitment frame; and this order specifically mentions that if any party, either the defendant or the plaintiff, believes such exercise to be unnecessary or unreasonable
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
