Sections 9 & 10 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Request for Recovery of Treasury Suit Defendant's Appeal for Vacation Approval Banking Court Defendant's Order for Unconditional Leave Accuracy Account Statement Multiple Entry Markup Charges Reflect that. And the other alleged unauthorized allegations, which need to be stated, the accounts and the claimant's statement were not confirmed to each other, the documents filed with the transcript were not determined without proof of justification. May be because the defendant did not have the opportunity to reject the same account and the defendant's statements. The Recovery Officer's confirmation is not yet pending and there is illegal charging from the defendant by the plaintiff bank and the unconditional leave of the plaintiff bank has been granted after the plaintiff's bank has considered all such matters on the banking court. And the documents are related to the defendants in that they raised questions for the law and the facts, which require conviction based on the evidence provided by the parties. The Banking Court used its discretion for reasonable reasons The plaintiff did not allege that the unidentified order was not affected by any legal jurisdiction or invalid claim. Plaintiff's secured interest provided sufficient security for financial liability No prejudice was inflicted by the improper order High Court dismissed constitutional plea in the circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
