Find a Lawyer

S. MUHAMMAD SHARI versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, SUKKUR

Sections 3 and 15 (2) of the Payment of Payments Act, 1936, as an outstanding applicant who retired at the age of sixty-two moved immediately to the employer for payment of the arrears in question before and after retirement. , But the employer did not respond with a confession, either dismissing the request or rejecting the request or allowing him to fail to fulfill his obligation under Section 3 of the Act. It was not an unfair or unlawful decision to ban the applicant's request under the Payment Act. If the wage payment Act under the Order of the Petitioner had to pay the applicant twice the amount of his claim, he could not take into account the fact that the applicant was neglected to go to the authority after such a long period. Was compiled top civil advocates from Utror lawyer