Find a Lawyer

SOUVENIR TOBACCO COMPANY LTD. versus MUHAMMAD SHAH

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O12 (3) Termination of Employment The services of the employees who were working as packing operators terminated on the machine on which the machine working employee was obliged Was done and the management decided to stop the work and because the machine did not work, the worker was overloaded to show that there were no employees available to work on the same machine. Was employed, there were other packing machines on which the worker could work was the fact that the machine on which The payee was doing the work, he was unemployed, when the termination of the job with the employer, the termination of the job may prove that when the employees were able to work, such other The machines also will not make the worker waste or useless. The service of the employees, the order of dismissal cannot be strictly stated in accordance with S. It is a requirement of the Standing Order 12 (3) of the Permit and Ordinance, which accordingly should be shown not only for this reason, but also for those reasons. Must be true which can stand in the Supreme Court. when you need a advocate from Bhakkar lawyer