LIAQAT ALI versus SHAKEEL SILK INDUSTRY
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 1 (4) (a) and Section O12 Establishment Applying an Ordinance on the Relations of Employers and Employee Proof Workmen Employing Less than 20 Employees It is alleged that his services were suspended. By violating section O12 (3) of the ordinance, it failed to prove that the employer employed 20 employees in its establishment on any day during the last 12 months to attract the application of the ordinance in its case. The employer, on the other hand, was fully established by presenting documentary evidence. According to the circumstances, there were less than ten workers employed by the Labor Court. It is precisely found that the ordinance (VII 1968) was not applicable to the establishment of employer evidence presented by employees on record, otherwise it was not sufficient to say that he was ever employed. Through the employers, the worker could not be ordered to re-order as there was no relationship between the employer and the employee standing between the parties.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Theing Jattan More lawyer