Find a Lawyer

ABDUS SAMAD KHAN versus PAKISTAN PETROLEUM LTD.

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 Date of Birth; Applicants' correction at the time of admission to the service in 1964, the year of its birth was presented as 1930 which was entered in the service record. The employer asked his employees to confirm the date including the applicant and the applicant reaffirmed that the retirement age in the 1930 establishment was 58 years later, on the last working day of the applicant year 1988. , The applicant had passed the request to the employer to correct his date of birth 1933, which claimed on the copy of the photo of the birth certificate obtained from the municipal commissioner, India, passport and civil certificate. The Surgeon employee, as well as the Labor Court, rejected the applicant's request for consideration of the fact that his birth year in the service record in 1964 was 1930, which was confirmed by him and the applicants. Corrections could not be protested in the age of because they depended on these documents. Subsequent records show that the certified copy of the Birth Register was not submitted by the applicants, which could be taken as public, except for the municipal commissioner's certificate from India, which has no facts in support of its evidence. Cannot be attached and the documents which the documents furnish and depend on the applicants were to be considered by the Labor Court which had to pass final orders. The Tribunal refused to intervene. immigration advocates phone number from Orakzai lawyer