NAJMUL ISLAM USRRANI versus PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORPORATION
Delegation of services 25 A & 38 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, the appellant was appointed as store keeper and he was charged by the inquiry committee appellant after he was found guilty and retired from the job. It was removed that he did not physically examine the stock and was unlikely to provide a suitable opportunity. Defending himself, and copies of the documents were not provided which he asked the defendant who allegedly did not comply with the natural justice record, which shows that the appellant had a reasonable opportunity to defend himself. Provided and is also charged at the store before taking the copies provided, and thus cannot be said to be in charge of the store without physically confirming it. The store was to be properly delivered / handled by the store and the store and other equipment were taken over by the appellant The Inquiry Committee is satisfied that the charge against the appellant was proved. The documentary evidence and the evidence on which the testimony was based on the H Inquiry Report was given by the Labor Court for reasons to convict the appellant. Labor Court search was retained
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
