Find a Lawyer

SHAMIM HYDCR versus PHILIPPINES AIRLINES

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O15 (4) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXII of 1969), a dismissal from Section 25A Appellant, Crew Assistant and Joint Secretary Appointment of Airlines CBA Staff Union. To bring the airport to a limited area via a freight gate, four suit cases, including four and meeting with other Airline staff members and others, said that the flight to Sydney Appellant The suit cases on the fly denied the allegations but admitted that they were arrested by customs authorities. Later, after the bail, the appellant's explanation did not prove satisfactory and he was dismissed from the job after the Inquiry Officer proved him guilty. None of the witnesses were examined by the source until the first information report or confession of the accused appellant's statement was proved to be unsuccessful. There was no evidence to give evidence that the accused did not bring any fear Lach's statement stated that the procedure adopted by the Inquiry Officer was not guaranteed by law or by any natural justice principles; such an inquiry-based dismissal order was not enforceable. Appellant was dismissed from employment. The order was set aside and the appellant was ordered to be reinstated with 50 back privileges, subject to a fresh inquiry. property advocate from Issa Khel lawyer