AQEELUZZAMAN KHAN versus DAILY MASHRIQ
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 25A (8) and 25A (9) of the contempt of court Act (XLIV Section 3 of 1976) were dismissed on the grounds that non-compliance with the order of complying with a criminal complaint No notice was given. Proper notice was given to the plaintiff / respondents complying with the complaint filed in the Labor Court, as well as demanding the record of evidence in contempt of court proceedings before the Tribunal case so that it could be ascertained. Why not comply with orders. Was held, under section 25A (8), the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, to lodge a complaint with the Registrar of the Labor Court of the Tribunal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Matli lawyer
