The complainant, appealing the criminal threat against the breach of evidence, gave a different version of the incident, and filed his own judgment, Statement improved. Justifying his presence at the alleged incident, otherwise he did not state in the FIR why he was present at the scene of the incident; other witnesses also excluded a separate fact from him, The complainant admitted enmity with the accused on the evidence of both eyes. The witnesses, who were the friends of the complainant, were interested and untrustworthy. Sayed witnesses could not be considered independent witnesses. When the parties were on extraordinary terms, independent witness was necessary. He himself had not even seen the accused. The complainant's wife, although the accused's sister, was not present at the time of the alleged incident, evidence, evidence of this was audible and the matter was not investigated by an investigating officer, but her Another police officer was investigated at the site, which indicated the handwriting of the two investigating officers only to prove their case against the suspect beyond any doubt, and the prosecution's defense The prosecution failed to establish a case beyond suspicion, the trial court ruled. So bad.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
