The absence of private witnesses on one or more dates of the Section 265K litigation diary reflects the appeal against the acquittal under Section 265K, CR PC, that the two separate. On separate dates, the complainant and the prosecution witness were present, the case record returned without investigation reveals that the prosecutor's witnesses were careful to follow their case The charge sheet revealed that some police officers. Was also presented as a prosecution witness, but the trial court's order of acquittal was never indicated An action against them was also issued. Official witnesses and they failed to appear in the trial court for evidence of the trial court on the basis of the absence of private witnesses on one or more dates for trial, however, it was not permissible to observe that the complaint There is nothing to be excluded from the prosecution and other prosecution witnesses, and in such cases the accused will have no chance of being convicted. Was granted, and the trial court decided to record the evidence of the prosecution's witnesses and the case on merit Was sent to the trial court.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
