Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

BISHAR AHMED versus SYED SIKANDAR ALI SHAH ALIAS SHER


Sections 526 and 497 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 23 Judge, the Anti-Terrorism Court, moved the trial court to the trial court, ruling on the request for bail under Section 497, CR PC. The complainant was denied the right to a hearing without issuing a notice to the Anti-Terrorism Court. No notice was issued to the complainant to guarantee the request. What can be done is, thus, the judge, the Anti-Terrorism Court, rejected the basic principle of law that would allow anyone Nuni could not take action. No one should be condemned (Audi ultimum partium) Judge's disputed order, the Anti Terrorism Court was set aside and after passing a fresh order on the jurisdiction after hearing the parties under Section 23 The case was returned to the Anti-Terrorism Court. Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Kamokey lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.