Articles 11, 53, 164 and 172 of the Specific Relief Act (in 1877), sections 42 and 54 of the Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), O. VII, R 11. There were options. The trial court, which filed a civil suit seeking exclusion from the registration of revenue and controversial record in the revenue record, dismissed the case and the order was upheld under the apex court's approval if the defendants were sued by the revenue officials. If dissatisfied with the order, they should have filed a review under section 1641. West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, Before the Board of Revenue, the plaintiffs did not neglect the highest forum in the taxation data, anyone aggrieved by some entry in the record of rights was enjoined by the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act of 1967. May demand the delivery of Section 53. The admission in his favor, thus providing for section 53 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, did not apply to the jurisdiction of the civil courts. In any case, sanctions were imposed under Section 11 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, which was filed on the basis of any revenue or any revenue officer's fault, unless the plaintiff could prove that they Has appealed through the law up to the time it is contained. The High Court refused to interfere with the limitation period of such case in the orders passed by the two courts as there was no material irregularity or jurisdiction in the courts or jurisdiction exercised thereunder. The review was removed because it was not implemented.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
