MIRZA KHAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD
Section 171 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Controversy Alternative Remedies The applicant claimed that the goods seized by the authorities were not smuggled but were legally imported because after receiving the showcase notice, the applicant Or any other claimant who may be, should respond to the showcase notice. The unidentified allegations are contained in all the available documentary evidence. If the relevant authorities were not satisfied with their response, the applicant had the proper way of challenging order before the customs authorities to decide on the matter, but he substituted. The solution did not take advantage of the confiscated goods being imported or smuggled or who was the original importer, evidence of which had to be recorded as being a matter of factual dispute which had additional constitutional jurisdiction The decision could not be made because the High Court refused to intervene in the matter This was because it was outside its scope. Conditions
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
