Article 199 The Constitutional Applicant was the wife of the Respondent of the Applicant of the Restoration Scope of the Child and she was divorced / The applicant had already referred to the Sessions Court under Section 491, CCP Children age for the same relief. Nine and seven years old and the applicant could not claim. The right to custody / custody of children who were under the supervision of their natural guardian with their father, custody of children with their father cannot be unlawful because they are responsible for their upbringing. Natural guardian applicant / mother should file a complaint with the station house officer against the husband for the custody of the children under the Gardens and Wards Act, 1890, or for the custody of the children to claim their rights. This did not mean that there were extraordinary circumstances for the High Court to request a constitutional jurisdiction. Were gone Seeking the High Court's jurisdiction for the recovery / production of children in the Court Petittee was an equitable, effective and alternative treatment of wool under the Guardians and Wards in 1890, and if they advised the Guardian Judge to recover the minors and their If there is an option to administer interim custody, she may file a Guardian Petition that was not sustained by a constitutional request which was rejected in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
