SHP ALAM versus ABASIN INTERNATIONAL
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968) Section O12 (3) Civil Procedure Code (VS 1908), OVII, R11 Complaint that the complaint was dismissed Was not requested. Appellant submitted himself but through a representative's statement from the appellant that he was present when the application was not filed and his opinion was that his services were terminated by verbal order, Therefore, there was an unrestricted termination of service, therefore, a violation of Section O12. ()) The Ordinance VI of 1968 was intended to be passed under Output VII, R 11, CPC of Ordinance VI, in fact there was an order on the merit which was approved after examining the evidence of the employees. No evidence on the enrollment of the employees but the matter should be dealt with but the workman was ordered to be reinstated with full back benefits.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Lala rukh lawyer