NASECR AHMAD versus LIPTON (PAKISTAN) LTD
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A West, Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section O2A Refusing to comply with legal order, Labor Court has appealed to the parties without permission to produce documentary evidence. Dismissed the appeal of The duties of the appellant labor court are based on the question of what duties the appellant has to perform under the rules and the order of the Labor Court in 1968, under the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance Ordinance. The case was remanded and the case was remanded in order to allow the parties to present additional evidence through documentary evidence, according to the blatant prejudice to the earlier observations made by the Labor and Labor Court or Appellate Tribunal. Decide on the case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Upper Dir lawyer