PERVAIZ AKHTAR SHEIKH versus ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN LTD
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A bank manager, dismissed appellant was dismissed for allegations of misappropriation and misappropriation of bank money, the Labor Court dismissed the complaint only That the notice of complaint was not processed. Bank Evidence was supported by legal evidence, which resulted in a notice of complaint to the bank's branch branch head office, but did not state whether it had confirmed the head office. Whether or not notice was shown on the notice was not shown to be incorrect, nor was the question presented to the appellant that he did not send a notice of complaint, to the evidence presented by both parties. To be legal and to presume legal, it cannot be said that the notice of complaint was not presented on the bank complaint. The request, in turn, could not be dismissed on the basis that the Labor Court did not approve the order on the merit and only dismissed the technical request that the complaint not be submitted, the Labor Court search was dismissed and the parties were dismissed. After hearing the arguments, the matter was referred to the Labor Court for judgment on merit on other matters.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Tando Allahyar lawyer