FAUJI SUGAR MILLS, TANDO MUHAMMAD KHAN versus SHER ZAMAN
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O15 Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25A Employee Elimination Employees were charged and their services were inspected after a domestic inquiry and other employee His son was terminated due to injuries. After being absent without leave, the Labor Court reinstated employees on the basis that the allegations against them were not proven. That the witnesses who turned against him were witnesses of the occasion and he was not in the service of the mills and that the employee was honored in the criminal case, both the injured and the witnesses were completely involved. Also acknowledged his presence on the occasion of the incident. Absence of Duty of Employees He was absent for 34 days during the five months and the statement of witnesses proved his absence The Inquiry Officer, who was stopped by the Labor Court before being examined by the Labor Court. There was no error in the inquiry process. The administration's plea for bead cannot be proved by the evidence provided by it; allegations of misconduct against the employee were proved by evidence, the Labor Court did not justify their rehabilitation services.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
