MUHAMMAD GOFRAN ALI versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3A) Removal of Complaint Request The respondent filed a complaint before the Labor Court challenging the order dismissing him from the establishment. Groundwater was banned at the same time because the defendant did not give a date for his dismissal from the job and only mentioned in his complaint notice that he had served for more than 28 years, the Labor Court said. Rejected the request that the threshold question is a mixed question because of this request. And the law that can be decided only after the evidence is recorded, the Labor Appellate Tribunal's request for an intervention in the use of the amending power was not illegal or invalid, the Labor Court's review The application was dismissed and the labor court was ordered to settle. Of the case
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Hattian lawyer
