Find a Lawyer

IRFAN AHMAD OURESHI, GENERAL SECRETARY versus PERSONNEL OFFICER

The termination of Articles 2 (j), 12 and 19 of the West Pakistan Shops and Establishment Ordinance 1969 was employed by the applicant whose head office was located in Karachi and the regional offices of the Lahore Petitioner requested that their services be given to them. Terminated because of trade union activities. Due to which he did not leave despite the employer's instructions which resulted in the applicant working, he was terminated, the respondent requested that his Lahore office is a separate establishment whereas Karachi office is a separate establishment and so on. Due to which the lowest establishment employee of the total establishment was to be removed. The department's respondents considered their area offices as a Establishment Department at the Head Office and said that employees were in uniform control and could be moved anywhere. However, the fact is that the regional Ming 6 company had the authority to operate the account and the money was sent from Karachi. Company profits for expenditure and loss of head office in Karachi, there was anecdotal evidence that the Area Office in Lahore was part of the Establishment in Karachi and the registration of the Shops and Establishments Act in the Area Office or premises in Lahore. And he had nothing. What to do with the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, as it was registered under the Regional Office Shops Act in Lahore, therefore, the terms of service of the employees posted in Lahore will be enforced under Shops and the Establishment Act was implemented on this basis. It was because of the appointment of these workers that their appointment came into operation. Head Office Karachi At present the respondent vibrates at the Head Office Karachi pakistani advocates Kakul lawyer