KSB EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION versus KSP PUMPS COMPANY LIMITED
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 50, 34 and 22b (3) (b) interpreting the settlement, applying for the applicant union which reached an agreement with the company praying for the interpretation of the clause clause And the number of objections to the retention was increased Petition parties agreed that in the event of a dissent from the opinion regarding the implementation, the applicant could challenge the decision of the management in an appropriate forum. Had accepted the implementation of the notification on which he said later in writing the relevant settlement clause. Was told The administration did not have a labor court decision or was not informed of the negotiating table. The administration was aware that the notification received was invalid and was not issued in accordance with any law. It was merely an administrative order and no No penalty. In the event of non-compliance, the notice was suggested that in the case of a legally inappropriate question, the applicant had no case that the petition was dismissed without any legal qualifications.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Jehangira lawyer