Sections (68 (b), 69, 99 99 (f), (70 (a)) and fake declaration of election certificates for election to the Provincial Assembly seat of Election Member were a good and honest rule of applicant dispute. That the retiring candidate was not honest, fraudulent, good, non-profit, honest and trustworthy as he had erroneously claimed as MA that the valedictorian retired candidate in his nomination papers filed before the Returning Officer. Failed to prove that the MA is genuine. Nomination papers certified by them on oath A retired candidate cannot be declared honest and upright because of his fake degree and false oath unless there is a law enacted under the Constitution unless he is eligible to be elected a member of the Assembly. A good and honest retired candidate did not qualify to be elected to the Assembly because he lacked the ability to be honest and honest and his election was invalid. The rule of thumb for casting votes was in the present case. Disqualification was notorious and voters knew the disqualification of the returning candidate, so the Will be smashed to obtain votes and was announced as the runner-up candidate. Returning Candidate In the present case, there was no evidence that the disqualification of the returning candidate was notorious for its voters and that their votes could not be cast and the applicant could not be declared. Was materially affected as a result of the current election. Approve the election request
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
