SYED AMJAD MAHBOOB versus RAJA MUMTAZ HUSSAIN ARIF
A VII, R 11 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), the Section 12 suit for the specific performance of the contract, dismissing the plaintiff's scrap, moved the plaintiff's request for dismissal with the issue which caused it to proceed. The cause was not disclosed and the case was stopped. The claim can be substantiated in legal status and other non-disputed material in the record, and the same may be considered for the plaintiff's dismissal, and he charged the plaintiff with all the charges that could be requested and A lawsuit has been filed for this. The specific performance of the immovable property question is whether the plaintiff would be able to prove the facts made in the case, whether for some reason it was irrelevant to the decision to dismiss the application for the same place. When the plaintiff recognized the suit property and the general sale agreement. The power of the sub-lawyer was hanged by him for consideration The plaintiff's defense could not unilaterally revoke the general power of the attorney granted by him, there was no consequence of the rebellion and proceedings because it was There was nothing in the record for such cancellation to be informed that the defendant's position was contradictory to himself and the parties to the question of facts could not be resolved without recording their respective persons. Without providing the parties with an opportunity to include evidence in such cases and without the opportunity to hear the case, the plaint cannot be ruled out in such cases when the person performing the specific contract of the contract Yours unanimously
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
