Section 2 (2 (b) Qatil Ahmed praised the evidence, the name of the accused, the role he played, the weapon used for the commission of the crime, the origin of the fight, the manner of the incident and the names of the witnesses). The accused immediately mentioned in the FIR were arrested along with a G III rifle which was allegedly used in the commission of the crime complaint and one eyewitness was the real brother of the accused. The witness was his cousin, but only a relative, the interested witness would not be kept and both the complainant's defense highlighted the details of the incident. No serious objection was made to the victim's hotel at the scene of the incident, all three witnesses were subjected to excellent scrutiny, but despite various search queries, no one could be benefited. The witnesses were charged against him. Ocular account was fully verified by medical evidence; no dispute will be noticed between That was it. Acular and medical evidence, which compiled the ballistic expert's report of the date, time and numerous injuries of the incident, clearly indicated that the three culprits recovered from the site of the incident were dismissed with a rifle. The weapons and vacancies recovered from the accused were fully supported by the prosecution case, failure to prove the purpose of the prosecution in the circumstances,
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
