SAADAT KHAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Sections 17, 25, 168 and 171 Notifications Section RO 486 (I) / 2007, Dated 9 2007 2007 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition False Declaration Capture Duty and Tax Demand Exemption Officers Submitted by Importer The goods did not accept the declaration and the additional duty and tax demanded that the plaque taken by the importer was that under the notification section R486 (I) / 2007, dated 96 2007, the goods should be sent only to the Customs Act, Can be detained under section 17 of 1969, the goods may be classified along with the description of the notification. False declaration was not appreciated when the goods were stopped and seized, the personnel had reliable information and the first evidence that it contained some false declaration in the description and / or quantity of the goods so the goods were seized and seized. Became responsible for Under section 168 of the Customs Act, 1969, authorities cannot provide a reason for detaining goods after being detained. Under Section 171 of the Customs Act, 1969, ice was issued to the importer and the matter was pending before the competent authority, before which the importer did not choose to act with the officials and he could not proceed without legal authority. Did not and the custody / seizure of the goods was with legal authority and consequently a proper show notice of detention / confiscation was issued to the importer.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
