Sections 302 (b), 315 and 316 of the convictions, the murder case and the definition of AMD evidence were examined at length from all witnesses, the defense council, during cross-examination, found evidence to prove or prove the allegation. Failed to retrieve something accordingly. Other witnesses verified the eyewitness testimony and were investigated at length by the Investigation Officer of the circumstances, but apart from a few minor contradictions, the defense lawyer failed to record any negative / significant subpoena, which led to the prosecution's obstruction. Can be born The minor contradictions obtained from the cross-examination of the Evidence Investigation Officer were not fatal in the prosecution's case, all the prosecution's testimony, though related to it. The complainant and other witnesses were also close relatives of the accused, but the witnesses of the two prosecutions did not conceal anything but the negative consequences of the admission and said that the true witnesses were credible and reliable witnesses and their evidence was credible. The incident was believed to be about 10 10. In the early morning, the two suspects were relatives of the prosecution witnesses, they knew about it, there was no question of mistakenly identifying the accused, the medical officer delayed the presence of the prosecution witnesses at the time of the incident. Got the evidence support. An hour to bring the injured to the hospital is considered appropriate because of the distance of about 15 km between the hospital and the site of the incident. And while the injured were used to spend some time before being transported to the hospital, there was no reason to deny the testimony of the prosecution witnesses, which was consistent with every aspect of the case, as well as evidence.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
