Sections 2 302, 4 394, 7 397, Qat2, ??4 and Q 34 Convicted of committing robbery, robbery or robbery with voluntarily attempting to cause death or serious injury, injury, assault or inaccuracy. The accused was charged with domestic offenses after preparation of the ban and abuse. The accused were accused of committing murder, while committing robbery, the trial court declared the accused guilty. The verdict was pronounced on 4 12 2009, while the appellant filed a jail appeal on 11 11 2010. The complainant was investigated before the trial court had described the incident in detail and identified the appellant before the defendant was stopped in his evidence, but the defense lawyer prosecuted. According to the suspect, nothing had failed to be extracted and no exaggeration was found. What did the witnesses say in the evidence of the complainant certified by the other witnesses? I saw that the witnesses were examined at length and nothing came on the record so that their evidence could cause a slight suspicion in the prosecution's case before the trial court did what it did during the investigation. Had deposed him in detail. The prosecution's testimony compels them to give false evidence that the complainant's version that the appellant's defendant had beaten by the eligible area was accepted with the help of medical evidence, the defense lawyer did not inspect the medical officer nor Suggested how the appellant accused suffered the injuries. Defendant's indictment indicates a contradiction in the evidence of the prosecution's witnesses
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
