Section 9 (b) criminal code of conduct (v. 1898), section 103 praised the evidence for drug possession and smuggling operations and recovery proceedings, reduction of co-accused pleaded mercy and reduced the already passed sentence. Appeal not submitted. The appeal of the co-accused was dropped by reducing the punishment of the accused along with them. No one would personally associate with the search and recovery of drug mafia members for fear of retaliation. There was no law protecting prosecution witnesses against such fears. Compliance with section 103, CRPC did not yield any results, especially when the waves of waves against these witnesses were not proved, due to the official bottle neck of the investigating officer for three to four days. It was normal to send samples late. , And the choice of the person supplying the sample, while retaining the unjustified decision, sentenced AC to less than three years for 18 months and a fine of nine thousand rupees.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
