SYED SOHAIL HASSAN versus THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU
Section 498 National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Sections 5 (r), 9 (a) and 9 (b) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application for voluntary arrest before arrest and corruption, High Court Approval of the jurisdiction of the Scoop Petitioner / Accused to grant pre-arrest bail to the arrestee that it was forcibly attached to the guilty default and that the judgment on the default amount determined by a competent court Could not be done Given the prima facie legal reasons to warrant arrest before the arrest, in rare and unusual circumstances, it was evident that documentary evidence was collected against the accused, indicating that he The money he deposited was not deposited and was deliberately fined. Section 5 (r) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, defined that the prosecution was not charged with any type of misconduct and this offense was found to be an offense under section 9 (a) of the Ordinance. ) As stated, allegations of corruption and misconduct were leveled against the accused / applicant that he had been wrongly involved in the case and only the competent court could determine the exact amount. , Can only be decided by the trial court where the trial proceeded because there was no widespread transfer of evidence at the time of the bail plea decision The trial was to be the main task of appreciation of evidence and can only be diagnosed by a temporary high. There were appropriate cases in deciding the application for a grant of court bail that the applicant / accused
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
