SYED ALI IRTEZA RIZVI versus PAKISTAN REINSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Articles 29 and 30 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional petition alleges corruption against the employee, fresh scrutiny, appropriate scope for hearing and defense against the applicants holding the scope, who were the General Secretary and President of the General Insurance Corporation Employees Union, respectively. ? He forcibly entered the corporation secretary's room and used shoddy and profane language to approve workers' demands. The applicants claimed that they had been granted amnesty in the first inquiry, but their record was allegedly lost after a fire broke out in the office of the alleged corporation. The second inquiry applicant was found guilty of corruption and was sentenced to four counts of lowering time. The petitioner's request was that he be punished in the first inquiry report. The appointment letter under which the Inquiry Officer was appointed was not provided to provide information as to who will conduct the inquiry. The inquiry officer who found them guilty was biased. That the Inquiry Officer was changed / altered due to the protests filed by the petitioners, however, the same person appeared as a witness in the inquiry against them, and that they were victimized by their trade union activities. Appeal was not given a proper opportunity, Applicants did not seek Chairman and Security Guard by Inquiry Officer during the second inquiry of the Corporation. Was punished, in these circumstances it was directed that the new
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
