Section 365 A & 34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997) Section 7 (e) Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 265 K, 435 and 439 Kidnapping for Prohibition, General Intent, Evidence from Terror Action The plea for acquittal by the trial court was found guilty by the trial court, 2 were convicted, but they were acquitted on appeal, 5 of the remaining 8 accused were eventually acquitted, while the remaining 3, who were absconding. , He was indicted, and his case was kept on an inactive file. Until his arrest, it was stated that the three accused, after his arrest, applied for his acquittal under Section 265 K, CR PC, which has been denied, saying that the accused had given the two main accused. Had already acquitted the High Court complainant and the abductor. Along with the trial, the defendants filed their affidavits before the trial court under CCPC, Section K65 K, under which they did not object, if it is said In connection with the accused, E has acquitted the recording of pre-existing evidence against the accused, who were not charged in the FIR. Or other material submitted by the prosecution will be a fruitless use of the trial court proceedings against the accused. And there was no possibility of his conviction in the crime. The trial court-approved verdict was set aside and the accused was acquitted. His bail was canceled and the bail bail was dismissed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
