In the bad judgment approved by the Section 417 (2A) trial court, the appeal against bad interference by the High Court was unnecessary, as long as the scrutiny of the evidence in the appeal against criminal discretion, forgery, forgery and against the record was strictly examined. Was not made, but the same approach was not to be applied in the same appeal against the acquittal; intervention by the High Court can only be done if the evidence relating to the abortion of justice has been grossly misrepresented. Yes, in the absence of strong evidence, the conviction of a defendant cannot be taken lightly. The pursuit of evil if not sacred, if the reasons were speculative or artificial, or based on any evidence, or the misinterpretation of the evidence, or the conclusions about guilt or innocence were the result of a misunderstanding of justice. If so, the High Court may intervene in this. The quest for evil
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
