Sections 8, 12 and 37 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), 53A suit sued for the possession of immovable property and the settlement of a controversial plot based on a lease deed for the specific performance of the contract. While the defendant filed a lawsuit for specific performance. The agreement was that the plaintiff's contention was that the disputed plot in his favor was leased out while the defendant's claim was that the lease deed was fake and both suits were collected and the plaintiff's case was dismissed while the defendant's case was dismissed. Along with the verdict, it was heard that the legitimate construction company had ceased to exist. As soon as the recipient was designated, the defendant was the owner of the disputed plot, the validity and authenticity of the documents was not challenged by the claimant No notice was issued to the defendant prior to the cancellation of the allotment. Was in possession of the right to protect his right, the new sale was not valid without canceling the previous allotment The amendment was excluded
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
