A. VII, Rr 11 & 10 Qunun e Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts 111 and 113 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 suit for the specific performance of the contract The plaintiff's rejection of the suit at an earlier stage Ali had a dispute. There was no cause for action and the plaintiff's case was false, unreasonable, dangerous and was unenforceable; the plaintiff's request for dismissal was accepted simultaneously. The point of the litigation was that the board was the owner of the property and in this case the plaintiff's plea was not inconsistent with the previous application of the litigation. The plaintiff was not willing to vacate the property in question. Intended and presented with ill intent. Deprive the defendant of his right to sue property. The contract for sale was executed during a previous litigation that could not have taken place. Lying in such a bitter and disturbing situation could not be ruled out in the preliminary phase of the trial when the plaintiff's dismissal was settled for proof of the plaintiff's copies and in the first period of litigation. I was writing a statement that was acknowledged. The facts which are judicially noticeable as disputed documents do not need to be proved, nor do any facts have to be substantiated which the other party has to admit / disprove in addition to the plaintiff's document, such as the former. The litigation record may also be examined to determine whether it was responsible or not. By return or rejection, the claimant failed to prove that the seller
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
