Prevention of unlawful disposal of components or components of Section 3 (1) of the Section 3 Illegal Property Act, 2005, alleges that there was no legal authority to do so. And the more important part of the Unlawful Disposition Act, 2005, was that the intent was to possess, control, or seize, seize, or seize property from the owner or occupier if the owner or occupier was the owner or The occupant must be disposed of. , Will not accuse the defendant of his whereabouts, or forcible possession of property, the provision of the Unlawful Disposition Act 2005 will not apply, to prove the offense, the complainant has the existence of both unlawful act and criminal intent. Have to disclose. The purpose of attracting the provisions of Section 3 of the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005, was to require the court to examine whether the property was immovable property. That the person was the owner, or the property was in his lawful possession. That the accused had entered the property illegally. That such entry was to evict, dispossess, or expel persons from the original occupation, or to seize, seize, apprehend or indulge in unlawful or unlawful occupation. At the time of the implementation of the Dispossession Act, 2005, the property would then fall into the jurisdiction of the Act in relation to the title of the property, which was not a function or was not authorized in the domain of the criminal court. With regard to Section 3, relating to the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005, provide a search in relation to the authenticity of a document.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
