Definition of Section 2 (2 (b) conviction AMD evidence found no dispute between medical and ocular evidence) The prosecution's witnesses fully supported the litigation case, which confirmed the evidence of police officers through medical evidence. They weren't just inappropriate because they belong to the police department - and they were good witnesses like everybody else, unless they showed a motive to falsely impersonate a person. As long as the defense version of the defendant listed on the oath, written under the oath, was not supported by either of the two defense witnesses. The defendant's statement was not appealed because of the defendant's statement, because he merely said he saw the suspects in his car with the armed men, while the other defendant's statement Listening, which was not acceptable, no weight can be placed on the defense version of the evidence when both versions were legalized and the prosecution's version was found to be effective and permanent. Because I was modest, they could not handle the prosecution, which was not to be weighed because, over time, The trend was that there were slight contradictions in the testimony. Witnesses \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
