Find a Lawyer

MANZOOR AHMED BHAYO versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY, W & PHD

Article 199 Enforcement of contractual obligations to retain constitutional petition The dispute applicant failed to complete work within the stipulated period The claim for payment of compensation for work projects including contractual contractor contractual question is Did the applicant complete the job? According to the terms and conditions of the agreement, the constitutional jurisdiction could not be resolved because the recording of the evidence was necessary to resolve the same unpaid amount for the work done by the applicant, proved by the evidence in the ordinary court. Can be done Jurisdiction, because if this amount is found and the defendant is admitted in this case then the High Court may exercise its discretion in favor of the applicant not only the applicant's claim but also the work as disputed. Fatal solution could not be resolved in constable Rejected inappropriate jurisdiction \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• Mst. AZIZ BANO v. Khalifa AZIZ MIAN 2014 CLC 1123
• IMRAN v. State 2014 MLD 1123
• HAJAN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1123
• SANOFI-SYNTHELABO v. ZAFA PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES (PRIVATE) LIMITED 2014 CLD 1125
• JAN MUHAMMAD v. GHULAM FARID 2014 MLD 1141
• Mst. NASREEN alias NAGINA v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1141
• MUHAMMAD SALEEM v. MUHAMMAD ALTAF 2014 CLC 1142
• FEROZE GOLAWALA v. VIRAF DAROGA 2014 PCrLJ 1150

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

lawer from fb area from Shahdad Pur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes