MRS. HUSNA RIZVI versus MRS. KIRAN ASIF ALI CHUDHARY
In approving the execution of suit of Section 19 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OI, R 10, O XXI, RR 84, 85 and 86, the interlocutor sought to impose himself as a necessary party. Of In the application, he was bidding the suit property during the execution of the decree passed by the Banking Court. The proposed interlocutor failed to deposit 25% of the bid amount in the relevant banking court and could not accept the auction buyer's position against the proposed interceptor. The matter was not required to be included in the intervener because the writ of attachment was issued in connection with the property owned by the Banking Court in the proceeding, therefore, the High Court refused to prevent the Banking Court from implementing the decree. ?
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
