SAEED-UR-REHMAN versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL INTELLIGENCE, ISLAMABAD
A. VIII, R11 Customs Act (IV of 1969), Section 47 Plaintiffs' Complaint for Eligibility of Appeal for Recovery on the basis of Mental Illness, Humiliation and Humiliation, in which Plaintiffs Defendant The rejection request was submitted. Customs and Department of Excise, which was accepted by the trial court, received notice that the plaintiff company that was recorded closed was in production and was supplying goods / cigarettes to the market without payment of central excise duty and sales tax. The plaintiff's factory was visited and the customs officials and records involved in the manufacture of cigarettes were denied by the plaintiff company's Central Excise Duty and Sales Tax and the Customs Act against the same profession. , Was banned under Section 217 of 1969, during the appeal of the plaintiff Abndy was imposed. He died before getting an injunction in his favor and is in his legal heritage. He did not continue to pursue the case even after his death because in such a case the victim was a personal case. There was no right to file, the suit for compensation for personal wrongdoing was personal with the person who could not be accused of any kind of malice in his presence. Appeal was dismissed by the trial court, against strong evidence that was properly denied by the trial court, which protected the interest of the State Plaintiff.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
