Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FAROOQ versus MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE

Article 199 The person affected by the retention of the constitutional petition was subject to double taxation on the auction of stand / accommodation by the Municipal Administration of Alternative Procedure that the bus stand in the premises of the premises was part and parcel of the premises and on the basis of the auction bead of the stands. And was against the law. The premises were part of the validity stands within the premises of the premises and only the parcel of the Ada was auctioned and the stands were not auctioned individually and a small amount of tickets was spent on the needs of the Transporters community. Was the chairman. The Registrar of the Transporters Association was a registered and angry person with the trade unions because the purpose of the auction was to recover some unauthorized persons who were against the law when there was an auction about terminals at the bus stand when the bus stand was auctioned. Was. Thus, its terminals would be doubled. Taxes that were prohibited under the law would have to be paid once under the current auction when the new contractor came out of the terminal and left the central base with the other before the previous contractor. Bargains have to be paid and ordinary people have to suffer and should be taxed twice when the operation was without jurisdiction and illegal but it was not necessary to take advantage of alternative alternative auction of terminals inside the bus stand. The executing authority's impersonation action was illegal and invalid and concurred with the agreement All proceedings were invalidated and the constitutional application was dismissed under the circumstances.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015

• MUHAMMAD SAID v. State 2015 PCrLJ 1108
• SHABNAM v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 2015 PLC(CS) 1111
• FAZAL FAQIR v. SAID HAROON KHAN 2015 MLD 1122
• ARSHID v. SHAMAN-UD-DIN 2015 PCrLJ 1123
• CHANZEB v. Mst. YASMEEN BIBI 2015 MLD 1140
• HAZIR ZAMAN v. BAKHT ZAMAN 2015 PCrLJ 1142
• HAKIM ZADA v. State 2015 PCrLJ 1171
• SAEED-UR-REHMAN v. CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, through Director General Intelligence, Islamabad 2015 PTD 1190

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2015 →

law firms from Dadu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes