Sections 9 (c) and 25 Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 (d) Possession and trafficking of unlicensed drugs, Section 103, Cr in Section 25 of the Control of Drug Substances The application for has been removed. The non-participation of the private advisers at the time of the recovery of the drug will not impede the prosecution's case, nor will the sentence be dismissed; the investigating officer can be a witness to the complainant as well. , The prosecution had no adverse effect. The police and excise personnel, like everyone else, were good witnesses. And his testimony also included other credible investigating officers and other prosecution witnesses, even though they were employees of the Anti-Narcotic Force. But there was no enmity or animosity against the accused for putting such a large amount of intoxicants on him. And the non-examination of any witness will not negate the merits of the prosecution's case. All the prosecution's witnesses supported the prosecution's case, the prosecutor was able to bring the suspect's crime home through an ocular account, drug recovery and chemical inspection. There was no reason for the report to dismiss the testimony of state witnesses for the accused, the trial court could not identify any false statements or evidence read by the trial court, indicating an error in the indictment verdicts. Failed to make, it was unthinkable decisions were made, not to demand any interference, under conditions \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
