THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU versus FAZAL AHMED JAT
Sections 8 (a) (i), 8 (d) and 32 Appellant Maintenance were raised by the acting Prosecutor General ScopePlay that the appeal filed by NAB was not authorized as the prosecutor did not hold the post of General. And the acting law officer was not authorized. Appeal. The health chairman NAB could only authorize another NAB law officer to act as a prosecutor general accountable, when the latter was absent or for any reason unable to perform his office, Due to which these options could not be used by Chairman NAB. Substitution of Prosecutor General Accountability during this period when the Office of the Prosecutor General was vacant under the provisions of Section 8 (a) (i) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, the appointment of the Prosecutor General NAB, however, on the recommendation of Chairman NAB. It is viable but allows an individual to act as the Prosecutor General NAB in an era associated with the President of Pakistan when the President of Pakistan has not appointed any one. , To the Chairman NAB any other legal officer pursuant to any legal authority The TR General was not authorized to act as Accountability Officer when the Office of the Prosecutor General Accountability was filing an empty appeal. Acting Prosecutor General NAB filed an inadvertent appeal during the period when the Office of the Prosecutor General Accountability was vacant, and the circumstances were dismissed \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
