Sections 324, 353, 148 and 149 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6 and 7 of the Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 (d) to prevent civil servants from being suspended, well, attacked. Or attempt to commit criminal force, attributing the evidence for the liability, turmoil, terrorist incident and unlicensed weaponry was presented by the Ocular Account Assistant Sub Inspector Police, prosecuting witnesses who were police officers. His testimony was fabricated by the accused. The version of the testimony mentioned was consistent with the material facts and facts. Some contradictions in the evidence of the prosecution's witnesses, which were trivial, had no effect. And it did not affect completion by the trial court prosecution witnesses, although the police officer, however, showed no reason to lie to the accused, suggesting that it was not the intent of the investigating agency to suggest anything unusual. Contradictions or contradictions cannot be questioned; the police officers were good witnesses like any other citizen; unless there is any prejudice against them, the deployment of police officers cannot be ruled out. Only on Ganji's allegation that he belonged to the police department who alleged that the case against him was a liar, and that a house dispute was registered on informal terms with the informant, documents presented Could not submit documentation to do. Counsel for the accused was unable to identify any misreading or reading of evidence or contradictions due to substance. The prosecution's trial resulted in the statements of the prosecution witnesses
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
