Find a Lawyer

KHUSHI MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Section 491 Habitat Corps Application Recovery with Wife Parents were the applicants and allegedly Ditto's husband and wife who had contracted the marriage without their consent and their parents' information. His wife had gone with his parents, who kept him in illegal custody. The petitioner's wife was detained by his parents and refused to be recovered from his parents' house by the police. Was because they would be humiliated and disgraced in the community as well as in the relatives and the neighborhood. The wife could not be declared illegal in the house of her real parents and the course adopted by the applicant was a serious step by her. High Court advises applicant to approach appropriate court in search of marital rights \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• Mrs. RUBINA ALI v. AYESHA KAMAL 2014 MLD 750
• ZARBAD KHAN v. State 2014 YLR 757
• The STATE through Chairman, National Accountability Bureau v. FAZAL AHMED JAT 2014 PCrLJ 758
• SARDAR MUHAMMAD ASHRAF D. BALOCH (PVT.) LTD. v. State 2014 YLR 771
• PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL BULK TERMINAL LTD. v. MAQBOOL ASSOCIATES (PVT.) LTD. 2014 CLD 773
• ALI GOHAR KHAN MAHAR v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2014 CLC 776
• ALI AKBAR v. State 2014 YLR 778
• AKBAR ALI SHAH v. State 2014 YLR 782

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

criminal advocate from Ranipur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes