MALIK AZIZ AHMED versus STATE
Definition of Clauses 17/22 Sentencing, lack of proof of return of detainees revealed that they had paid the complainant according to the question and had not been charged with alleged complainant's collusion. The immigrants were cheated by the accused. In the circumstances, along with the documents along with the documents, the intention was returned to the migrants and none of them had referred the FIA officials to any legal action against the accused. For the past twenty years, the trial has been subjected to torture while the convict was acquitted on appeal. The period given to the accused was reduced by the time he passed and the fine was also reduced to Rs 25,000.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Musakhel lawyer