Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MURTAZA versus STATE

Sections 2302 and 4 324/3434 of the testimony were confessed on the ocular account by the prosecution's four witnesses, on the record, through medical evidence in which four of the two witnesses were admitted by the accused as one of the prosecution's witnesses was an independent witness. Had nothing to do with it. The Syed witness of any party was a natural witness because there was a shop near his presence and he had no intention of falsely implying the accused Syed Saeed witness was also injured in the incident. Although one of the prosecution's witnesses was related to the prosecution, his presence was not denied by the accused on the occasion. He was not an interested witness because he had no intention of being involved in false accusations. Even with the rest of the witness's relationship with the deceased, it is not necessary to suspect the incident which was performed by the doctor post mortem on the body of the deceased. The fully affirmed statements of the accused prosecution witnesses, who made a special plea in their statement under Section 222 CCPC, had the burden of proving that they were exercising their right to self-defense. The preparation was not taken to the police. No witnesses from the investigation area were presented to the trial court, stating that the defendant's request for self-defense contained no description of the presence of the pistol on the site story provided by the accused. In which the victim fired two bullets at him with a 12 bore gun, but the defendant, who was the target of a bullet or any other person on the spot, was not acceptable to the trial court. immigration advocates phone number from Minchanabad lawyer