Find a Lawyer

DR. AZHER ATA MALIK versus CHAIRMAN, NAB

The accused, accused of appreciating Section 9/10 evidence, had already come to the bank with the completed forms, asking the manager to open a 20 different account and approve the loan under the Yellow Cab scheme for the purchase of 40 vehicles. He pressured bank officials to expedite the approval of the loan, he came to the bank with the car dealer and asked that the purchase of the vehicle be given to the dealer mentioned above. Went for required insurance. And he went to the Office of Excise and Taxation for his registration, as well as to read the handwriting export statement when the alleged chains in the prosecution case, who were accused during the trial, ever saw evidence of this fellow's handwriting expert. Did not challenge his skills Cannot be properly dismissed and, if it is recorded by other evidence and material, may be relied upon, otherwise, the partner stated that he had been discharged by the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 Under Section 31B, there was a witness, like any other witness, and if his testimony had to be obtained with the help of other evidence on record and it was confidently stated that there was no enmity with the fact of the witness's testimony. The documentary evidence was confirmed by a handwriting expert, who was charged with superstitious belief in independent circumstances that he did not appear as his own witness in defense of the denial of the allegations and that evidence was presented against him and The only defense witness examined by him was no result. The accused had deceived the bank by misrepresentation, fraud famous high court advocate from Chak Jhumra lawyer