GULZAR AHMED versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), section 302/34 bail, the grant of a further investigation was a night event allegedly witnessed by the witness in the moonlight and the torch was both killed in that incident. The possibility of getting together in the background cannot be ruled out that both the victims were killed under sudden and serious provocation, both the accused were found innocent in all four consecutive investigations, leaving the two accused behind. The report was submitted by the police, but was not acted upon by Magistrate Prima but there was sufficient material available in the form of an affidavit of these witnesses. Ho, who supported the defendant's plea of the defendant to the defendant's plea, was in his home where, according to the defense, the victim had taken some intoxicating substance admin, causing the co-accused to be deep and sharp. Enjoying the sleep seemed to have a similar basis for bail bailing, especially when the incident was actually called at the time of the incident when the house said that the accused's case, as such His crime was presented for further investigation, the trial would not be a hindrance. In order to bail the accused, bail was granted in the circumstances to the extent of the participant accused but he was dismissed and denied bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Karachi lawyer